0.00/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 05:43:53 EDT 2024 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.16/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aZj4do7WvS/E---3.1_9106.p 0.16/0.52 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.16/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA. 0.16/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.16/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.16/0.52 # Starting additional_ho_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.16/0.52 # Starting new_ho_9 with 180s (1) cores 0.16/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.16/0.52 # Starting post_as_ho6 with 180s (1) cores 0.16/0.52 # additional_ho_6 with pid 9185 completed with status 0 0.16/0.52 # Result found by additional_ho_6 0.16/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA. 0.16/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.16/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.16/0.52 # Starting additional_ho_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.16/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0) 0.16/0.52 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLF31-MHFFFSBN 0.16/0.52 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHFFFSBN 0.16/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.16/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores 0.16/0.52 # new_ho_10 with pid 9191 completed with status 0 0.16/0.52 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.16/0.52 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA. 0.16/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.16/0.52 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (4) cores 0.16/0.52 # Starting additional_ho_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.16/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0) 0.16/0.52 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLF31-MHFFFSBN 0.16/0.52 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHFFFSBN 0.16/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.16/0.52 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores 0.16/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s 0.16/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.16/0.52 0.16/0.52 # Proof found! 0.16/0.52 # SZS status Theorem 0.16/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_sort1, type, secrecy_Expression: $tType). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_sort2, type, secrecy_KS: $tType). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_sort3, type, secrecy_Keys: $tType). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_sort4, type, list_S529945141ession: $tType). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_sort5, type, secrecy_specID: $tType). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_35, type, knowle945212990e_know: secrecy_specID > secrecy_KS > $o). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_36, type, knowle731562421_knows: secrecy_specID > list_S529945141ession > $o). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_65, type, cons_S112077679ession: secrecy_Expression > list_S529945141ession > list_S529945141ession). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_71, type, nil_Se901661471ession: list_S529945141ession). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_123, type, secrecy_kE: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_Expression). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_125, type, secrec1016742679ession: secrecy_KS > secrecy_Expression). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_126, type, secrecy_kKS: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_KS). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_139, type, a: secrecy_specID). 0.16/0.52 thf(decl_140, type, m: secrecy_Keys). 0.16/0.52 thf(fact_7_know1k, axiom, ![X19:secrecy_specID, X261:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle731562421_knows @ X19 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X261)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))<=>(knowle945212990e_know @ X19 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X261)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aZj4do7WvS/E---3.1_9106.p', fact_7_know1k)). 0.16/0.52 thf(fact_13_KS2Expression_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X2:secrecy_Keys]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X2))=(secrecy_kE @ X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aZj4do7WvS/E---3.1_9106.p', fact_13_KS2Expression_Osimps_I1_J)). 0.16/0.52 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_kKS @ m)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aZj4do7WvS/E---3.1_9106.p', conj_0)). 0.16/0.52 thf(fact_0_assms, axiom, (knowle731562421_knows @ a @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_kE @ m) @ nil_Se901661471ession)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.aZj4do7WvS/E---3.1_9106.p', fact_0_assms)). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X975:secrecy_specID, X976:secrecy_Keys]:(((~(knowle731562421_knows @ X975 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X976)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))|(knowle945212990e_know @ X975 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X976)))&(~(knowle945212990e_know @ X975 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X976))|(knowle731562421_knows @ X975 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X976)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_7_know1k])])])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X992:secrecy_Keys]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X992))=(secrecy_kE @ X992))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_13_KS2Expression_Osimps_I1_J])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_kKS @ m)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X2:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X1 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X2))|~((knowle731562421_knows @ X1 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X2)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X2:secrecy_Keys]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X2))=(secrecy_kE @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_kKS @ m)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X2:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X1 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X2))|~((knowle731562421_knows @ X1 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_kE @ X2) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_11, plain, (knowle731562421_knows @ a @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_kE @ m) @ nil_Se901661471ession)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_assms])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_kKS @ m))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.16/0.52 thf(c_0_13, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12]), ['proof']). 0.16/0.52 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.16/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 490 0.16/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 426 0.16/0.52 # Initial clauses : 139 0.16/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.16/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 133 0.16/0.52 # Processed clauses : 164 0.16/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 3 0.16/0.52 # ...subsumed : 9 0.16/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 152 0.16/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 27 0.16/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.16/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.16/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.16/0.52 # Generated clauses : 39 0.16/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10 0.16/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.16/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.16/0.52 # Paramodulations : 13 0.16/0.52 # Factorizations : 0 0.16/0.52 # NegExts : 0 0.16/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 33 0.16/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.16/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 20 0.16/0.52 # ...of those cached : 11 0.16/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.16/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0 0.16/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.16/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.16/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.16/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.16/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.16/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.16/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.16/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.16/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.16/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.16/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 25 0.16/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6 0.16/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.16/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 5 0.16/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 14 0.16/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 89 0.16/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 309 0.16/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.16/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 110 0.16/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1623 0.16/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 643 0.16/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7 0.16/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11 0.16/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.16/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.16/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.16/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 164 0.16/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0 0.16/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 19315 0.16/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7442 0.16/0.52 0.16/0.52 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.16/0.52 # User time : 0.020 s 0.16/0.52 # System time : 0.005 s 0.16/0.52 # Total time : 0.025 s 0.16/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages 0.16/0.52 0.16/0.52 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.16/0.52 # User time : 0.036 s 0.16/0.52 # System time : 0.008 s 0.16/0.52 # Total time : 0.044 s 0.16/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2848 pages 0.16/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting 0.16/0.52 % E exiting 0.16/0.52 EOF